Products
Gloves
Other Products
Hazards
Sectors
Brands
Services & Resources
Services
Certificates
Resources
Healthcare Education
About Us
Company
Division
People
Investors
Media
Contact
Sustainability
How We Care

CHOOSE YOUR COUNTRY / REGION

Can't find your country? Visit our international website

EN 388: UNDERSTANDING THE EUROPEAN STANDARD FOR GLOVES

Nadiah Johari
Nadiah Johari
EMAP Marketing Communications
european standard for gloves
Cut Protection

If you work with sharp materials, tools, or machinery, understanding EN 388 safety glove standards is essential. This standard defines how gloves are tested for mechanical protection, including cut resistance, abrasion, tearing, and puncture risks.

In this blog, you’ll learn what EN 388 means, how glove cut ratings work, and how to choose the right cut-resistant gloves for your job.

 

 

WHAT DOES EN 388 MEAN ON GLOVES?

Cut Protection

EN 388 appears as a shield pictogram followed by numbers and letters.

Example: EN 388: 4X42DP

EN 388 RATING CHART (QUICK REFERENCE)

The EN 388 rating chart explains how protective gloves are tested for abrasion resistance, cut resistance, tearing, puncture resistance, and impact protection. This chart helps you compare glove performance levels and choose the right protection for your task.

PERFORMANCE LEVEL RATING

Code Protection Type Rating Scale Performance Level Rating Level Meaning
A Abrasion Resistance (cycles) Level 1-4 Level 1: 100
Level 2: 500
Level 3: 2000
Level 4: 8000 		Higher levels indicate greater resistance to rubbing and surface wear
B Blade Cut Resistance (Coupe Test/Index) Level 1-5 or X Level 1: 1.2
Level 2: 2.5
Level 3: 5.0
Level 4: 10.0
Level 5: 20.0 		Higher levels indicate stronger protection against blade cuts
C Tear Resistance (Newton) Level 1-4 Level 1: 10
Level 2: 25
Level 3: 50
Level 4: 75 		Higher levels indicate stronger material resistance to tearing
D Puncture Resistance (Newton) Level 1-4 Level 1: 20
Level 2: 60
Level 3: 100
Level 4: 150 		Higher levels indicate stronger protection against punctures from sharp objects
E EN ISO13997 Cut Resistance (TDM Test/Newton) Levels A-F A: Lowest cut resistance
F: Highest cut resistance 		Higher letters indicate greater force required to cut the material
F EN Impact Protection P P indicates the glove passed the impact protection test P indicates the glove passed the impact protection test

CUT RESISTANCE TESTS

Coupe Test

  • Measures how many cycles a rotating blade takes to cut through the glove material
  • Level 1: basic protection
  • Level 5: highest protection under the Coupe test

Note: Blade dulling can reduce accuracy for modern high-performance gloves.

EN ISO13997 Cut Resistance (TDM Test)

  • Measures the force (in Newtons) required to cut through the glove material
  • A: lowest cut resistance
  • F: highest cut resistance
  • Provides a more reliable assessment for modern high-cut-resistant gloves

When both ratings appear, A-F cut rating is generally the more important reference in high-risk environments.

HOW TO CHOOSE THE RIGHT CUT RESISTANT GLOVES FOR WORK

Cut Protection

SELECTING THE RIGHT LEVEL OF PROTECTION DEPENDS ON YOUR TASK

PROTECTION PROTECTION TASK
Light-Duty Work
For tasks such as assembly, packaging, and general material handling		 • Choose gloves with lower cut resistance levels: ISO A–B or Coupe levels 1–2
• Focus on flexibility and dexterity
Medium-Risk Work
For automotive manufacturing, warehouse operations, or construction		 • Choose gloves rated ISO C–D or Coupe levels 3–4
• Provides a balance between cut protection and comfort
High-Risk Work
For sheet metal handling, glass processing, or heavy industrial work		 • Choose high cut-resistance gloves rated ISO E–F
• Designed for environments with significant cut hazards

Always assess the actual hazard level before selecting safety gloves. Learn more about EN 388 and HyFlex® work gloves.


TIPS FOR CHOOSING THE RIGHT CUT-RESISTANT GLOVES

Many workers misunderstand glove ratings, which can lead to choosing the wrong protection.

Common mistakes include:

• Relying only on the Level 5 rating: Level 5 refers only to the Coupe test, not the ISO cut resistance rating.
• Ignoring the EN ISO13997 Cut Resistance (TDM Test): High cut-resistant gloves should always be evaluated based on the A–F cut rating.
• Choosing gloves that are too bulky: Higher protection is not always better if it reduces dexterity and productivity.
• Not matching gloves to the hazard: Different industries require different levels of protection.


Understanding the EN 388 glove rating system helps ensure the right balance between safety, comfort, and performance. Learn how workplace safety saves costs and protects your business.


INDUSTRIES THAT USE EN 388 CUT-RESISTANT GLOVES

EN 388 certified gloves are widely used in industries where workers handle sharp materials or abrasive surfaces.

Common industries include:

• Metal fabrication
• Automotive manufacturing
• Construction
• Warehousing and logistics
• Aerospace and defence

In many workplaces, cut-resistant gloves are a key part of PPE safety programs that help reduce injuries and improve overall workplace safety.

FAQ

Do cut resistant gloves really work?
Yes. EN 388 certified gloves significantly reduce cut injuries when matched to the correct hazard level.
What is the highest cut resistant glove level?
Under EN ISO13997 Cut Resistance (TDM Test), Level F is the highest cut resistance rating.
Are cut-rated gloves puncture proof?
No glove is completely puncture proof. Higher EN 388 puncture ratings improve resistance but do not guarantee full protection and do not indicate protection against
needle punctures.
What does “X” mean in EN 388?
It means the specific test was not performed or not applicable for that glove model.

 

 

 
Cut Protection

For a more detailed breakdown of cut resistance levels and how to select the right glove for your application, explore the full guide.

DOWNLOAD NOW

Note: Performance levels are measured using different test methods and units, including cycles (abrasion), index (Coupe test), and Newtons (TDM and puncture tests), depending on the protection type.

Subscribe to Safety Briefing Newsletter

All blogs