Products
Gloves
Other Products
Hazards
Sectors
Brands
Services & Resources
Services
Certificates
Resources
Healthcare Education
Blogs
About Us
Company
Division
People
Investors
Sustainability
Media
Contact
Where to Buy
Buying Options

CHOOSE YOUR COUNTRY / REGION

Asia Pacific
Europe
Latin America
Middle East and Africa
North America
January 26, 2019

MICROFLEX Gloves Outperform

We Tested Against the Leading Purple & Lavender Competitors

Why it Matters and How We Prove it

How is Ansell better?

When tested against the leading purple and lavender glove competitors, Ansell gloves such as MICROFLEX XCEED, MICROFLEX Supreno SE, and MICROFLEX Supreno EC were proven to provide better strength, superior comfort and more consistent barrier integrity.

See more detail below on how MICROFLEX compared to the leading competitive gloves on the metrics of strength, comfort and barrier integrity, or download the comparison sheets for more complete data.

MICROFLEX XCEED XC310 vs Leading Lavender Glove Competitor 9522

MICROFLEX XCEED XC310 vs Leading Lavender Glove Competitor 1222

MICROFLEX XCEED XC 310 vs Leading Lavender Glove Competitor - [MICROFLEX XCEED XC-310 vs Leading Lavender Glove Competitor]

Featured Products

Request Samples

Try one of our products. Let us help you find the best solution.

Request Now

Comparison Charts

Videos

YouTube video thumbnail Video play icon

MICROFLEX® Supreno SE SU-690 & MICROFLEX® Supreno EC SEC-375

Made from durable nitrile with advanced barrier protection (0.65 AQL), these sturdy gloves are ideal for longer wear times and demanding applications. Examination grade. Blue / Violet.

YouTube video thumbnail Video play icon

MICROFLEX® XCEED XC-310 Nitrile Disposable Glove w/ ERGOFORM™ Technology

Ansell's most durable thin mil nitrile glove. Ergonomically certified, lightweight, thin nitrile formulation provides exceptional tactile sensitivity, strength and advanced barrier integrity (0.65 AQL). Examination grade. Blue.

Request Samples

Data on this page is based on results of laboratory tests. These tests were run using standard EN test methods that may not adequately replicate any specific conditions of end use. Because Ansell has no detailed knowledge or control over the conditions of end use, this data is advisory only, and Ansell assumes no responsibility for any reliance on the information.

* Source: Leading glove competitor’s Technical Data Sheets.

** Unaged # Based on superior modulus as detailed in the chart above.

Join the Conversation

Corporate
Healthcare
Industrial